* * * * *
A meticulous
analysis of a careless prosecution.
(This review is
based on a paid-for copy of the Kindle edition.)
On the day that Lucy
Letby was first convicted, the author had only a passing interest in
the case, which seemed to be dreadful beyond belief. But as the day
wore on, the frenzied and sensational reporting began to ring an
alarm bell or two, so he started listening to and closely watching
news broadcasts and online reports, waiting for someone to describe,
or at least summarise, the evidence. He eventually began to wonder if
there WAS any evidence, and thus began a three year investigation
which led to his reading millions of words of often complex medical
information, and interviewing hundreds of genuine experts, whereas
the police investigation and prosecution employed only a handful of
experts, who were notable for the fact that the better they
understood the weight of what they were saying, the less they found
it prudent to say in public or in court and this had the effect of
surrendering the witness box to one of the least reliable “expert”
witnesses in legal history for more than 90% of the trial.
The author’s
journey was from examining what seemed to be one of the worst serial
killing cases in British history, via a belief that the only crimes
actually committed might be those of negligence and omission, to a
belief that there were no crimes committed at the Countess of Chester
Hospital at all. The text of this book includes something of
significance on every page and this means that there are hundreds of
them. It’s an awesome piece of work but the author does lack one
thing: knowledge of issues and legalities around bullying, stalking
and harassment (especially of females) and how those laws were all
being tightened in England and Wales in the same years that the Letby
saga was unfolding. Armed with some knowledge of these issues it is
possible to see, amongst all the evidence which Mr Morris presents
with so much care and skill, that which Lucy Letby’s principal
accusers created for themselves and which could have proved them
guilty of criminal harassment and not just breach of codes of conduct
and professional slander.
And having created
that “evidence” for the purpose of both bullying Ms Letby into
abandoning the career that she loved and her managers into wanting
her gone, they reacted to the “grievance” panel finding in favour
of Ms Letby by “doubling down” that is, they made a determined
effort to get the police to commence a murder investigation, to which
they handed certain cherry-picked and manipulated “evidence”
including the document variously known as the “Roster Chart” and
the “Shift Chart”, which was the most influential evidence in the
prosecution.
If you use concocted
evidence to make someone leave her job, or get her sacked, that’s
harassment and if there are two of you it’s conspiracy to harass.
But when you hand that concoction to the police to use in an
investigation which you campaigned for and which you have been (most
improperly) allowed to advise despite being the complainants and this
causes your intended victim to be wrongly convicted of multiple
murders and attempted murders, that’s perjury and conspiracy to
pervert the course of justice. Sentencing guidelines say that the
penalty for perjury must be in proportion to any penalties that were
imposed on the victim of your perjury. Lucy Letby was given FIFTEEN
whole life prison orders.
It is the evolution
of the Roster Chart originally created with the help (under protest)
of hospital managers desperate to stop Lucy’s accusers making
completely baseless claims by helping them to stick to the facts,
into the scarcely recognisable “Shift Chart” presented at Ms
Letby’s trial, which proves an intent to bully and harass Ms Letby.
And in the process of making it look as if she was, uniquely, always
on duty when “murders” were done, by removing others (including
ALL doctors) from the chart completely, they managed to deceive not
only the court into thinking that Mr Letby was often on duty and
nobody else was present at the relevant times, they convinced
themselves of this fact too and they changed their recollections of
events to fit! A nurse being alone in an intensive care unit for
premature babies with several patients requiring one to one care
would not have been suspicious: it would have been an EMERGENCY and
had it ever happened there would be records of an immediate
investigation. There are none: it never happened that way.
The references that
Amazon forbids:
The Ministry of
Justice documents which give an understanding of how the law, and
policies around investigation and support for stalking were changing
at the time of the Lucy Letby saga, are on this link:
https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publications/living-in-fear-the-police-and-cps-response-to-harassment-and-stalking/
This was the
culmination of a process begun by David Blunket; it all started to actually happen while Theresa May was Home Secretary.
To read a short, but
enlightening document, it is necessary for the reader to visit the
“evidence” page of the Thirwell Inquiry websites and search for:
“Pages 1-3 of
notes of an interview of Ian Harvey conducted by Dr Chris Green”
This is document
INQ0003156 – dated 07/11/2016 but you have to search for the
description not the document number; perhaps to stop bots trawling
for data to feed the dreaded AIs! Click on the link with the right
number, though, if you are presented with a choice of several.
Dr Chris Green, who
conducted the grievance investigation on behalf of the grievance
panel, was already concerned about the Roster Chart (known by several
names as it evolved) precisely because it was evolving in a way which
made it more and more focused on and lethal to Ms Letby, whose
grievance he was investigating. What he wants to check with Dr Ian
Harvey, was whether or not the Roster Chart as it once was, now names
only nurses and no doctors whatsoever. And he’s trying to get Dr
Harvey to see for himself how legally dangerous it is for the whole
hospital if Ms Letby does file a formal complaint of workplace
bullying. (If she had got her complaint in before she was accused of
murder, that chart would have proved that she was being targeted for
harassment by its creators and the hospital would have had to sack
them and compensate her. The hospital’s legal advisors actually
said that Lucy Letby suing for constructive dismissal and winning
compensation was actually the BEST outcome they could expect! A
criminal harassment case would be worse, and her accusers had just
created proof of that.)
Beyond Reasonable
Doubt by Christopher Morris is published by Cinto Press (Bath
Publishing Ltd) as of the 9th of July 2026.