Lessons from the Holocaust about Forced Organ Donation

Firstly, for those who believe that the CCP and the 610 Office are pretty nice folks who would never resort to forced organ donations from prisoners of conscience and oppressed ethnic minorities, here is a short (16 minute) video which summarises the published evidence. (There was also a two-page spread starting at page 32 in the Mail on Sunday for March the First 2020, quite independent of Chris Chapell and his sources. This seems to have been widely ignored, but no-one has credibly refuted it.)

During the video, Mr Chapell claims that not even the NAZIs resorted to organ-harvesting during the holocaust. Of course this is largely true*, but only because, prior to the conception and development of immuno-suppressant drugs in the sixties, human body organs did not have a significant market value in the forties. In fact, everything about holocaust victims (those who died in actual concentration camps) that had a commercial value, was exploited. I have an American friend whose landlord proudly boasted that she had a tablelamp with a shade made from human skin, which her GI husband had brought back from Dachau. (There are times when I need reminding which side the US Army was on.) Body fat was famously turned into soap, gold teeth were extracted, live victims were experimented on, especially during the execution of commercial contracts which the SS had with Bayer -a firm that is still very much in business- and even human hair was taken and sold. (Recently, three tons of hair from Uyghur prisoners was found and confiscated at a US port. Each person contributes a few ounces of hair, so three tons equals an awful lot of prisoners and this was only one shipment.)

But above all, the Holocaust was designed and organised to maximise the harvest of the victims' possessions, property, money and investments. The whole point of fairly-publicly loading each batch of victims onto trains and transporting them across Europe, was to give the Jews and other victim populations the idea that they had all better keep their most precious possessions hidden in their luggage or about their persons and not bury them in the woods where they might never be found if the lawful owner died. Those suspected of having substantial investments were given special attention aimed at making them pay these investments over as a ransom for their own lives and those of their loved ones. In some cases, just enough cases, such people were actually allowed to cross into Switzerland. But many more were simply tricked and bullied out of their investments on their way to the death camps. Once there, their heads were shaved and they were made to leave their luggage in piles and undress before they were gassed. (Traces of cyanide gas would have made it more difficult to search the clothes for hidden jewels, gold coins or share certificates.) Even spectacles and shoes were collected, though many of these items remained in the camps at liberation. Above all, the NAZIs prized the assets which victims already had in banks and safety-deposit vaults outside the Reich. Especially those in Switzerland. Taking control of those assets, by blackmail or torture of the password-holders, saved the guilty men the trouble of moving the assets to where they hoped to flee when the NAZI state collapsed, which the smart NAZIs always knew it would. The Holocaust was intended to and to some extent succeeded in completely liquidating the commercial value of the Jews being exterminated. THAT is the lesson we must learn, if we are to both understand and deal with what is happening in Communist China in the present day.

When I decided to deal with the issue of organ harvesting (amongst others) in my novel "The Lord of Billionaires' Row", I decided to do it logically and not emotionally, because the sort of mind we are dealing with here does not really experience emotions at all. Not only are the victims totally exploited for everything they have got as well as everything that they are, but before they are even taken into custody they are selected as worth exploiting. The victims all follow some kind of spiritual practice: in this case either Falun Gong or Christianity, but elsewhere in the book it is made clear that ALL of China's Muslim minorities are also targets, not just Uyghurs. This is simply because spiritual practice and some kind of moral code means that the unwilling donor is unlikely to have been a drug user or sexually promiscuous, so they will be much less likely to carry HIV or other deadly viruses. The majority of victims in my novel are portrayed as Falun Gong practitioners and indeed the video, above, suggests that Asian people wanting to buy black market human organs from the CCP tend to regard Falun Gong practitioners as particularly healthy and the source of the very best-quality organs. This belief may indeed be the primary reason why Falun Gong is persecuted in China!

Apart from being fit and healthy, the harvesting victims in my novel are selected because they are prosperous: either very prosperous or moderately prosperous; they are all believed to have something worth stealing. My anti-hero, Mr Ren, is surprised when a 610 Office supervisor accuses him of having assets worth two hundred million US dollars. Firstly, he's always been satisfied to be on an upward trend and has never totted up the sum total of his wealth, and secondly, doing so in US dollars strikes him as unpatriotic. But, given the imperatives of the totalitarian forces condemning him to death, the fact that Mr Ren has substantial assets that are already outside Chinese jurisdiction makes him a much more attractive victim than those whose wealth is all locally-held.

This is not me exercising an author's imagination so much as logic, based on my having read a great deal of material about the Holocaust over more than forty years. This isn't just the way it happens in my book: it is the way it happens.

The video above merely aspires to present evidence that forced-organ harvesting is happening in Communist China, partly for the benefit of wealthy recipients from outside China. (Uyghur donors are attractive to those from the Middle East who require organs that have been nurtured on a halal diet. Trying to force Uyghurs to eat pork, as the CCP routinely does, helpfully identifies those who will not break halal rules to save their lives. (It's an irrational requirement: nothing stolen is halal.))

But an understanding that every victim who has assets will have been stripped of them before their body organs are harvested, and any assets so confiscated that are already overseas or in an attractive currency will tend to end up in the personal portfolios of the officials organising the harvesting, is key to gathering evidence that will bring to justice those responsible for what is, for all practical purposes, another Holocaust.

*Selected body organs were harvested by SS doctors from Holocaust victims who had been carefully exposed to experimental medicines, poisons or general industrial chemicals, on behalf of Bayer. So that they could see how much good/damage the chemical did.